Ecological Restoration Ecosystems Survey for 2004-2006

This web page is a survey of the Ecological Restoration Professionals and University Researchers, to report what they have been able to achieve in 2004-2006
in non-riparian ecosystems.

The new URL of this page is http://www.lovepeppers.com/reportform.html

This survey's goal is to get at least one example reported from each of the Kuchler's ecosystems in the United States. Ecosystems outside of the USA are also welcome to report.

Survey results compiled by Craig Dremann, The Reveg Edge, Calif. (650) 325-7333 or email


Reporting Form - Put your Ecosystem on the Kuchler Map!

Ecosystem Being Reported (Please use Kuchler map for USA, see bottom of page for list; other Countries, please cite Vegetation Map you are using, plus the Ecosystem)
For projects outside of the USA, the World Wildlife Fund has good ecosystem categories at http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/

ECOSYSTEM:

Firm/Agency/Univ.:

Contact person:

Address:

Phone:

Email:

Web page, text:
Web pages, pictures:

DETAILS ABOUT AN EXAMPLE PROJECT SITE:

Example Site's State or Province and County
Coordinates: Latitude , Longitude
Elevation, feet .
Annual Precipitation. of example site, inches:
Acres of the example site:
Prior to work, percent cover: % native, % exotic plants
End of work, percent cover:% native, % exotic plants
Years of work:

Work involved (check all that apply):
Exotic plant cutting, pulling , burning, Grazing, Protected from Grazing ,
Herbicides, Tilling, Seeding, Planting, Local seed collection ,
Local seed were commercially reproduced,
The local native soil seed bank provided most of the resulting native plant cover ,
Other methods used: (please specify):

Ecological Restoration Licensed Technologies* (E.R.L.T.) were used,
If E.R.L.T used, whose ?:

If your own E.R.L.T., are licenses available for others to use? Yes , No

Total annual costs per acre:

Any articles citing the example project:

Anything else you would like to add: Number of native species in project, list of species and native plant families, etc.:

Please submit a separate form for each ecosystem you are reporting.

*"Ecological Restoration Licensed Technologies" for a detailed discussion on this topic, please see the journal ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION 2001, Vol. 19, No. 2, pages 70-71, Commentary: "Does the Lack of Patent Filings Indicate that Ecological Restorationists Fail to See Themselves as Inventors or Innovators?".



SURVEY RESULTS OF
REPORTING ECOSYSTEMS



INDEX OF SURVEY PARTICIPANTS:

Brevard County Environmentally Endangered Lands Program, Florida (Mangrove)

The Reveg Edge, Redwood City, California (Saltbush)

The Reveg Edge, Redwood City, California (Grassland)

Shaw Nature Reserve, Gray Summit, Missouri (Grassland)

Shaw Nature Reserve, Gray Summit, Missouri ("Cedar Glade")

University of Florida/IFAS Sea Grant Extension Program (Sea Oats prairie)

AUSTRALIA

SOUTH AFRICA



Kuchler's Map Vegetation Categories
and Reported Restoration Projects

__________________________________________
WESTERN FORESTS
Needleleaf Forests
1 Spruce-cedar hemlock forest
2 Cedar-hemlock-Douglas fir forest
3 Silver fir-Douglas fir forest
4 Fir-hemlock forest
5 Mixed conifer forest
6 Redwood forest
7 Red fir forest
8 Lodgepole pine-subalpine forest
9 Pine-cypress forest
10 Ponderosa shrub forest
11 Western ponderosa forest
12 Douglas fir forest
13 Cedar-hemlock-pine forest
14 Grand fir-Douglas fir forest
15 Western spruce-fir forest
16 Eastern ponderosa forest
17 Black Hills pine forest
18 Pine-Douglas fir forest
19 Arizona pine forest
20 Spruce-fir-Douglas fir forest
21 Southwestern spruce-fir forest
22 Great Basin pine forest
23 Juniper-pinyon woodland
24 Juniper steppe woodland

Broadleaf forests
25 Alder-ash forest
26 Oregon oakwoods
27 Mesquite bosques

Broadleaf and needleleaf forests
28 Mosaic of numbers 2 and 26
29 California mixed evergreen forest
30 California oakwoods -- also see No. 48
31 Oak-juniper woodland
32 Transition between 31 and 37

WESTERN SHRUB AND GRASSLAND
Shrub
33 Chaparral
34 Montane chaparral
35 Coastal sagebrush
36 Mosaic of numbers 30 and 35
37 Mountain mahogany-oak scrub
38 Great Basin sagebrush
39 Blackbrush
40 Saltbush-greasewood


Ecosystem: No. 40 Saltbush-greasewood* (see note below)
Firm.Agency.Univ: The Reveg Edge
Contact.person: Craig Dremann
Address: Box 609, Redwood City, CA 94064
Phone: (650) 325-7333
Email: email
Web.page: http://www.ecoseeds.com/kern.html
State.county: California, Kern Co.
Coordinates: 35
° N. Latitude, 119° W. Longitude.
Elevation: 200 feet
Annual.Precip: 3-6"
Acres:300
Native.cover: 0%
Exotic.cover:0%
End.natives:98%
End.exotics:2%
Years: 1

The local native soil seed bank provided most of the resulting native plant cover: Yes
Licensed.technologies.available: Yes

Other: Originally the 300 acres was a dry-land grain field, and it was discovered that the native soil seedbank under the exotic plant cover contained both annual and perennial local natives species, which grew and covered the entire area within one year.

The purpose of this study was to measure how quickly habitat could be restored for the various species of Endangered Kangaroo Rats in the San Joaquin Valley. A future mitigation project for the San Joaquin Valley, on a massive scale, has been proposed by the U.S.Bureau of Reclamation office in Fresno, as mitigation for the environmental damage caused by the Federally-managed Friat dam. The Bureau of Reclamation, working with the Bakersfield BLM, are in the process of buying up whole irrigation districts (e.g. about 10 square miles south of the town of Alpaugh), and "retiring" the irrigated farmlands, with future plans of restoring the natural habitat.

The Endangered seed-eating mammals of the San Joaquin Valley are currently trying to exist on a diet of nearly 100% exotic plant seed, because the native habitat has been so severely degraded by 140 years of overgrazing; and the populations of these mammals are still deceasing, or in some areas becoming extinct. Perhaps the exotic seeds don't have all the nutrients required by these species?

At least $2,000,000 annually is being spent by the Federal government on University research on the Listed San Joaquin valley mammals, but apparently nobody had ever set out trays of local native seeds, to determine what plants of the original native ecosystem would have been be utilized by the Kangaroo rats for food.

If you are going to restore habitat for a grain-eating mammal, it might be useful to know what native seeds they might utilize? We set out two dozen kinds of local native seeds in 2002, and found that most species of perennial native grasses and wildflowers were all collected and cached within a few hours!

The seeds of this soil-seedbank of this ecosystem were estimated to be over 50 years old. As a note of caution, this be near the limit of seed longevity of these native seeds, so if other projects in this part of California want to utilize the native soil seedbank, there may be only 20-25 years left.

The name "saltbush" gives the impression that this was historically mostly a shrubland, but 200+ years ago, it was probably more like an arid alkaline grassland, at least in part, with a scattered shrub component. It became a solid shrubland when overgrazed 1860-1940, and you can see this type of change from arid grassland to shrubland from grazing, in the arid grassland photos taken by Dr. Robert Humphrey at http://www.ecoseeds.com/desertgrass.html.

E.R.L.T.: The Reveg Edge's technologies are available.
Licenses: Yes



41 Creosote bush
42 Creosote bush-bur sage
43 Palo verde-cactus shrub
44 Creosote bush-tarbush
45 Ceniza shrub
46 Desert: vegetation largely absent

Grasslands
47 Fescue-oatgrass
48 California steppe


Ecosystem: No. 48 California Steppe and understory of No. 30 California Oak Woodland.
Firm.Agency.Univ: The Reveg Edge and Michael Shaw (Landowner)
Contact.person: Craig Dremann (The Reveg Edge)
Address: Box 609, Redwood City, CA 94064
Phone: (650) 325-7333
Email: email
Web.page: http://www.ecoseeds.com/standards.html
State.county: California, Santa Cruz Co.
Coordinates: 36.8
° N. Latitude, 121.2° W. Longitude.
Elevation: 100-300 feet
Annual.Precip: 20-25"
Acres: 74
Native.cover: 1%
Exotic.cover: 99%
End.natives: 85%
End.exotics: 15%
Years: 3 intensively, 15 overall.
Burning: No
Grazing: No
Herbicides :No
Tilling: No
Seeding: No
Planting: No
Local seed collection: No
Local seed were commercially reproduced :No
The local native soil seed bank provided most of the resulting native plant cover: Yes
Licensed.technologies.available: Yes

Other: Other proprietary techniques used, not available for licensing.
Originally only a few dozen native species were present over the entire 74 acres, and it was discovered that the native soil seedbank under the exotic plant cover contained over 200 different species.

The seeds of this soil-seedbank were estimated to be over 100 years old. The principle native plants that appeared out of the seedbank were members of the figwort, grass, legume, lily,mint, orchid, poppy, purslane and sunflower families. As a note of caution, this may be near the limit of seed longevity of these native seeds, so if other projects in this part of California want to utilize their own native soil seedbank, there may be only 20-25 years left.

To show the difficulty in restoring this ecosystem: the County of San Mateo, under the original Habitat Conservation Plan permit (San Bruno Mtn. HCP), have been spending $145,000 per year for 20 years, (total of $3,000,000-4,000,000) to restore this native grassland ecosystem, to mitigate for destroying Endangered Species Critical habitat---without one successful acre completed so far.

E.R.L.T.: The Reveg Edge's technologies are available.
Licenses: Yes

Article.citing.project: Dremann, Craig C. with Michael Shaw. 2002. "Releasing the Native Seedbank: An Innovative Approach to Restoring a Coastal California Ecosystem." ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION. 20 (June, No.2): 103-107.



49 Tule marshes
50 Fescue-wheatgrass
51 Wheatgrass-bluegrass
52 Alpine meadows and barren
53 Grama-galleta steppe
54 Grama-tobosa prairie

Shrub and grasslands combinations
55 Sagebrush steppe
56 Wheatgrass-needlegrass shrubsteppe
57 Galleta-three awn shrubsteppe
58 Grama-tobosa shrubsteppe
59 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna
60 Mesquite savanna
61 Mesquite-acacia savanna
62 Mesquite-live oak savanna

CENTRAL AND EASTERN GRASSLANDS
Grasslands

63 Foothills prairie
64 Grama-needlegrass-wheatgrass
65 Grama-buffalo grass
66 Wheatgrass-needlegrass
67 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass
68 Wheatgrass-grama-buffalo grass
69 Bluestem-grama prairie
70 Sandsage-bluestem prairie
71 Shinnery
72 Sea oats prairie


Ecosystem: Sea oats prairie
Firm.Agency.Univ: University of Florida/IFAS Sea Grant Extension Program (NE Florida)
Contact.person: Maia McGuire
Address: 3125 Ag Center Drive, St. Augustine, FL 32092
Phone: 904-824-4564
Email: email
Web.page.text: http://stjohns.ifas.ufl.edu/sea/seagrant.htm
Web.page.pictures: http://stjohns.ifas.ufl.edu/sea/seagrant.htm
State.county: Nassau Co, Florida (Fernandina Beach) [north of Jacksonville]
Coordinates: Latitude: 30.6
° N. Longitude: 81° W.
Elevation: 0-20
Annual.Precip: 40-60"
Acres: see below
Native.cover.prior.to.work: 5
Exotic.cover.prior.to.work: 0
End.native.cover: 75
End.exotic.cover: 0
Years: 1
Planting: Yes

Additional: Volunteers planted 45,000 sea oats (Uniola paniculata) seedlings (purchased from a commercial supplier in Florida) along about a 3/4 mile stretch of primary sand dunes in October 2001, March and April 2002.

This area of dunes had been devastated by a combination of strong storms and foot traffic over the previous 3-4 years. There were patches of existing vegetation, but these patches were small and isolated. The City of Fernandina Beach received a grant from the state of Florida for the restoration. Extension agents from UF/IFAS Cooperative Extension helped by coordinating volunteers and instructing them on proper planting methods. The fire department ensured that the sea oats were watered regularly during the first few months after planting.



73 Northern cordgrass prairie
74 Bluestem prairie

Ecosystem: No. 74 - Bluestem prairie
Firm.Agency.Univ: Shaw Nature Reserve (of the Missouri Botanical Garden)
Contact.person: James C. Trager
Address: P.O. Box 38 / Gray Summit MO 63039
Phone: 636-451-3512 X6002
Email: email
Web.page: www.mobot.org/MOBOT/naturereserve/
State.county: Franklin Co. Missouri
Coordinates: 38.6
° N.Latitude, 90.4° W. Longitude.
Elevation: 445-690 feet
Annual.Precip: 35"
Acres: 250
Native.cover: <5%
Exotic.cover: >95%
End.natives: >80%
End.exotics: <20%
Years: 23
Cutting.Pulling: Yes
Burning: Yes
Herbicides: Yes
Tilling: Yes
Seeding: Yes
Planting: Yes
Local.seed.collection: Yes
Seed.commercially.reproduced: Yes

Other: Winter sowing, followed by mowing new plantings during first growing season have been helpful in establishing natives during early succession when aggressive, fast-growing weeds would otherwise dominate. Brush-hogging (mowing) during growing season also helpful for managing some weedy species thereafter.

E.R.L.T.: N.A.

Articles.citing: Several in Missouri Botanical Garden Bulletin, received by contributing members.

Additional: Ongoing project includes plantings on former farmland or pasture virtually every year from 1980 to 2003. Another approach has been to burn old fields with already significant native grassland diversity and overseed with additional species. This has led to some of the most diverse and "natural looking" prairie reconstructions in just a few years, comparable to the oldest and best of the till-and-sow prairie reconstructions. A herbicide-and-sow approach has also been used to reduce erosion, with apparently good success (plantings still young).


75 Nebraska Sandhills prairie
76 Blackland prairie
77 Bluestem-sacahuista prairie
78 Southern cordgrass prairie
79 Palmetto prairie

Grassland and forest combinations
80 Marl-Everglades
81 Oak savanna
82 Mosaic of numbers 74 and 100
83 Cedar glades


Ecosystem: Cedar Glade (a misnomer, see explanation below)
Firm.Agency.Univ: Shaw Nature Reserve (of the Missouri Botanical Garden)
Contact.person: James C. Trager
Address: P.O. Box 38 / Gray Summit MO 63039
Phone: 636-451-3512 X 6002
Email: email
Web.page: www.mobot.org/naturereserve
State.county: Franklin Co. MO
Coordinates: 38.6
° N.Latitude, 90.4° W. Longitude.
Elevation: approx. 600-650
Annual.Precip: 35"
Acres: 50
Native.cover.prior.to.work: 99%
Exotic.cover.prior.to.work: 1%
End.native.cover: 98%
End.exotic.cover: 2%
Years: 12
Cutting.Pulling: Yes
Burning: Yes
Herbicides: Yes
Seeding: Yes
Local.seed.collection: Yes

Other: Cedar trees removed, invasive woody plants cut and herbicided, locally collected seed sowed in bare areas due to shading by cedars or scorching by burn piles. Prescribed burning used to maintain treeless condition.

Volunteers (including two Americorps groups) have been essential to this effort at every step.

Articles.citing.project: Several in Missouri Botanical Garden Bulletin (circulated to all MBG members)

Additional: The Kuchler designation "Cedar Glade" is a misnomer. This type of xeric, calciphilic grassland should more properly called dolomite glade. Cedar (Juniperus virginiana) is an invasive woody plant in these grasslands, which 200 years ago did not occur in them at all. GLO survey notes for our property, dated March 1818, make no mention of cedars or any other trees on the glades, which are described as "poor, stony ground, no timber". Cedar trees shade out, or at least reduce vigor and reproduction of perhaps 20 dolomite glade perennial herb species which grow nowhere else on the property (and also do so to even an even greater number of generalized native grassland species, shared with the prairie, but often more abundant on the glade.)



84 Cross timbers
85 Mesquite-buffalo grass
86 Juniper-oak savanna
87 Mesquite-oak savanna
88 Fayette prairie
89 Blackbelt
90 Live oak-sea oats
91 Cypress savanna
92 Everglades

EASTERN FORESTS
Needleleaf forests

93 Great Lakes spruce-fir forest
94 Conifer bog
95 Great Lakes pine forest
96 Northeastern spruce-fir forest

Broadleaf forests
98 Northern floodplain forest
99 Maple-basswood forest
100 Oak-hickory forest
101 Elm-ash forest
102 Beech-maple forest
103 Mixed mesophytic forest
104 Appalachian oak forest
105 Mangrove

Ecosystem: 105 Eastern Forest/Mangrove
Firm.Agency.Univ: Brevard County Environmentally Endangered Lands Program
Contact.person: Raymond Mojica
Address: 5560 North US 1, Melbourne, FL. 32940
Phone: 321-255-4466
Email: email
Web.page.text: n/a
Web.page.pictures: n/a
State.county: Brevard County Florida
Latitude: 28
° 04' 05" N
Longitude: 80
° 33' 38" W
Elevation: 0-3
Annual.Precip: 52 inches
Acres: 10
Native.cover.prior.to.work: 50%
Exotic.cover.prior.to.work: 50%
End.native.cover: 95%
End.exotic.cover: 5%
Years: 2
Cutting.Pulling: Yes
Burning: Yes
Herbicides: Yes
Local.seed.bank.provided.most.of.native.plant.cover: Yes
Other: Brontosaurus mower
Articles.citing.project: n/a

Additional: The intent of the Pepper Cove Impoundment Restoration project was the reconnection of an historic salt marsh to the Indian River Lagoon. To accomplish this, the EEL Program partnered with the Brevard County Mosquito Control District (BCMCD), the St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD), the Marine Resources Council (MRC), and a graduate level restoration and mitigation course from the Florida Institute of Technology (Florida Tech).

The project consisted of the reconnection of the isolated salt marsh, removal of exotic plants from the project area, re-vegetation with native salt marsh plants and the production of educational materials and displays. The project site is part of a 30-acre parcel donated to the EEL Program by the Richard King Mellon Foundation and is located adjacent to the future site of the Barrier Island Ecosystem Center (BIEC) which will serve as an educational center within the Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuge.

The BIEC will provide opportunities for public education regarding the restoration of wetlands and the protection of water resources and provide easy access for management and monitoring of the project.

The project site is a ten (10) acre impoundment, called Pepper Cove, located on the barrier island of Brevard County, Florida, approximately 3 miles north of the Sebastian Inlet. This impoundment, along with most of the salt marshes in east central Florida, were impounded (surrounded by earthen dikes) to discourage the laying of eggs by salt-marsh mosquitoes.

The Pepper Cove impoundment was constructed in the late 1950s and has undergone drastic ecosystem changes related to its isolation from the Indian River Lagoon. A review of aerial photos from 1943 through to the present, along with recent field surveys, show that the herbaceous salt marsh present in the 1940s has been replaced by plants which have exploited the altered hydrology.

Research has shown that a variety of both ecologically and economically important species of fishes and invertebrates utilize mangrove/salt marsh systems as nursery habitats.

The impoundment of salt marshes for mosquito control limits the amount of nursery habitat available and leads to decreased biological diversity and a break in the nutrient cycling between the lagoon and upland habitats. The proximity of the Pepper Cove impoundment to the Sebastian Inlet, a primary source of many vertebrate and invertebrate recruits, made the reconnection of this impoundment highly desirable.

The EEL Program Land Manager will act with guidance from BCMCD in managing water levels within the impoundment to maximize exchange between the marsh and the lagoon and maintain effective mosquito control.

Though scheduled to begin on October 1, 2000, initiation of work was delayed while Brevard County and the State of Florida worked on a contract which would streamline the process of receiving grant funds for the removal of exotic plants from EEL Program managed lands. For a variety of reasons the contract was not signed until March of 2001 immediately after which the exotic removal was scheduled.

On April 10th, exotic removal began utilizing the Brontosaurus mower operated by John Brown and Sons, Inc. Approximately 12 acres of dense monoculture Brazilian pepper were removed from within the project area in approximately 3 weeks. The removal of approximately 125 Australian pine trees were removed by Staff from the Marine Resources Council. The Australian pine trees were piled on a disturbed portion of the site and were prescribed burned to promote native plant regeneration.

Once Brazilian peppers had been removed from the project site we were then able to access the dike, survey elevations and prepare the site plan for the permits which were required for the culvert installations. A permit application was completed and submitted to the St Johns River Water Management District and the Army Corps of Engineers for review and received in September of 2001. The culverts, which had been purchased and invoiced in September 2001, were moved to the site and the Brevard County Mosquito Control District was able to complete the installation of the culverts by October 20th, 2001.

The northern culvert installation was a simple matter of setting siltation barriers, digging through the dike to the appropriate depth, installing the culvert, leveling to sea level and covering. The distance between the interior of the marsh and the lagoon was too great to allow for a simple culvert installation which is limited to a maximum of 40 feet in length. To cover the nearly 200 feet separating the lagoon and the marsh we had decided to run the culvert from the lagoon to a created deep pond which was then connected by a meandering creek to the interior marsh.

In order to prevent the areas which had been cleared of exotic plants from becoming re-infested we adopted a three prong approach. For areas along State Road A1A, which had been coastal strand and maritime hammock habitats, the land is being closely monitored and all exotics are being removed while native plants, whose seeds had remained viable in the soil, are being encouraged. For the area of spoil generated by the construction of the adjacent canal, the pepper was cut and pines cut and left on site and a prescribed fire utilized to regenerate nutrients and allow for re-colonization of native plants.

For the culvert locations, including the dike and the created pond, it was decided that a native planting would be required to quickly stabilize the soil and prevent re-colonization by exotics. On December 1st, a group of 24 volunteers, overseen by the Marine Resources Council planted 4000 native salt marsh plants and associates. These plants are flourishing thanks to the care and monitoring of Marine Resources Council Staff.

Due to their role as nursery habitat for many lagoon species, and their positive impact on water quality, there is an urgent need to educate the public on the value of salt marshes and their management throughout the Indian River Lagoon region. To address this need we immediately set out to collect detailed information which would document the state of the property prior to restoration and which would be required for the permits required for the restoration. To accomplish this we enlisted the help of a graduate level Restoration and Mitigation Course at Florida Tech.

Graduate students conducted numerous studies including detailed elevation, plant, animal, soil and water chemistry surveys during the course of the project. Much of this information is critical for the long term monitoring of the site and documentation of activities and portions will be utilized on interior interpretive displays once the BIEC is opened. Much of the data collected by Florida Tech students was incorporated into an educational kiosk, funded by the St Johns River Water Management District, located at the site of the southern culvert/pond which describes the restoration activities, partners and the history of salt marsh management along the Indian River Lagoon.




Broadleaf and needleleaf forests
106 Northern hardwoods
107 Northern hardwoods-fir forest
108 Northern hardwoods-spruce forest
109 Transition between numbers 104 and 106
110 Northeastern oak-pine forest
111 Oak-hickory-pine forest
112 Southern mixed forest
113 Southern floodplain forest
114 Pocosin
115 Sand pine scrub
116 Subtropical pine forest


ALASKA ECOSYSTEMS
1 Hemlock-spruce forest (Tsuga-Picea)
2 Spruce-birch forest (Picea-Betula)
3 Black spruce forest (Picea)
4 Muskeg (Eriophorum-Sphagnum-Betula)
5 Alder thickets (Alnus)
6 Cottonsedge tundra (Eriophorum)
7 Watersedge (Carex)
8 Dryas meadows and barren (Dryas-Carex-Betula)
9 Aleutian meadows (Calamagrostis-Anemone)
10 Aleutian heath and barren (Empetrum-Vaccinium)


HAWAII ECOSYSTEMS
1 Sclerophyllous forest, shrubland and grassland (Heteropogon-Opuntia-Prosopis)
2 Guava mixed forest (Aleurites-Hibiscus-Mangilera-Schinus)
3 Ohia lehua forest (Metrosideros-Cibotium)
4 Lama-manele forest (Diospyros-Sapindus)
5 Koa forest (Acacia)
6 Koa-mamani parkland (Acacia-Deschampsia-Myoporum-Sophora)
7 Grassland, microphyllous shrubland, and barren (Deschampsia-Styphelia-Vaccinium)


ECOSYSTEMS REPORTING outside of the USA

Ecosystem: AUSTRALIAN: South Australia, Coorong and Lower Lakes Ecological Area, International Ramsar Wetland
Firm.Agency.Univ: University of South Australia, AUSTRALIA
Contact.person: Joan Gibbs
Address: Mawson Lakes, South Australia 5095, AUSTRALIA
Phone: 61-8-802-5164; Fax 61-8-802-5082
Email:
email
Web.page.text:
www.biodiversityrestoration.org.au (soon to be released)
State.county: Murray-Darling Basin, South Australia
Latitude: 35
° 70' S
Longitude: 139
° 34' E
Elevation: 27 inches
Annual.Precip: 35 inches
Acres: 120
Native.cover.prior+to.work: 5
Exotic.cover.prior.to.work: 95
End.native.cover: 35
End.exotic.cover: 65
Years: since 1998; 5 years
Cutting.Pulling: Yes
Burning: Yes
Herbicides: Yes
Seeding: Yes
Planting: Yes
Local.seed.collection: Yes

Other: A university course in Landcare, Soils and Restoration, which uses principles of Ecosystem Management and Traditional Ecological Knowledge; The project is a partnership with the first nations people of the land, the Ngarrindjeri, and all activities must be through involvement and negotiation with these people, who have a 40,000-year association with the local flora and fauna.

Article.citing.project: Submitting an article to Ecological Management and Restoration, (Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia Inc., Membership management, P.O. Box 8250, Alice Springs, NT 0871, AUSTRALIA
http://www.ecolsoc.org.au/) entitled "Restoration and Restaurants in Ngarrindjeri Country on the Coorong, South Australia"

Additional: Grants for project management were over three years from the Commonwealth Government;

Over 200 volunteers have been registered on the project; countless volunteer hours;

Species list of 65 species, but only 12 have been successfully propagated; seed testing and research by honours and postgraduate students is underway;

Incorporation of responsible tourism through course in Eco-tourism



Ecosystem: SOUTH AFRICAN Mountain Fynbos; Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho & Swaziland; Low A B & Rebelo A G 1996; DEAT Pretoria.
Firm.Agency./Univ: Cape Ecological Services & University of Cape Town
Contact.person: Patricia M. Holmes
Address: 23 Dreyersdal Rd, Bergvliet, Cape Town 7945, South Africa
Phone: South Africa; 021-712-7816
Email:
email
Web.page.text: N/A
Web.page.pictures: N/A
State.county: South Africa, Western Cape
Latitude: 34
° 05' 40"S
Longitude: 18° 22' 20"E
Elevation: 500 ft.
Annual.Precip: 27 inches
Acres: 1.0
Native.cover.prior.to.work: 0
Exotic.cover.prior.to.work: 100
End.native.cover: 98
End.exotic.cover: 2
Years: 3
Cutting.Pulling: Yes
Seeding: Yes
Local.seed.collection: Yes
Local.seed.bank.provided.most.of.native.plant.cover: Yes

Other: Sowing of indigenous fynbos seed mix important for re-introducing serotinous overstorey shrub component.

E.R.L.T.whose: Experimental restoration trial run on behalf of a kaolin mining company. Trial investigated impacts of different topsoil depths, seed and fertilizer addition in achieving indigenous cover after clearing the existing woody alien stand.

Articles.citing.project: Holmes, P. M. 2001. Shrubland restoration following woody alien invasion and mining: effects of topsoil depth, seed source and fertilizer addition. Restoration Ecology 9:71-84.

Additional: 142 indigenous species were recorded at the field trial site in the first 3 years after alien clearing of which 85 derived exclusively from relictual soil seed banks under the 35-year-old alien stand.

Here is a list of the plant families and number of species for each that appeared from the soil seed bank: Apiaceae-2, Asphodelaceae-1, Asteraceae-9, Campanulaceae -6, Crassulaceae-1, Cyperaceae-12, Droseraceae-1, Ericaceae-7, Fabaceae-4, Gentianaceae-1, Haemoderaceae-1, Hyacinthaceae-1, Iridaceae-6, Juncaceae-2, Malvaceae -2, Mesembryanthemaceae-1, Oleaceae-1, Orchidaceae-1, Oxalidaceae-3, Poaceae-3, Polygalaceae-3, Restionaceae-1, Rhamnaceae-2, Rosaceae-4, Rubiaceae-1, Santalaceae-2, Scrophulariaceae-3, and Thymeliaceae-4.



Updated January 10, 2005 - This is also Issue 13
of Craig's Juicy Native Grass Gossip & Research.